(888) 424-5757

FREE, CONFIDENTIAL CONSULTATION

Search
 

Counterarguments to Common Defenses in a Dog Bite Lawsuit

Injury Lawyer Team > Legal Advice  > Counterarguments to Common Defenses in a Dog Bite Lawsuit

Counterarguments to Common Defenses in a Dog Bite Lawsuit

Counterarguments to Common Defenses in a Dog Bite Lawsuit

Dog bite attacks can result in serious injuries, leading victims to pursue legal action to recover compensation for medical bills, lost wages, emotional distress, and other damages. The American Veterinary Medical Association highlights that the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has reported more than 4.5 million dog bites annually in the U.S., with over 800,000 of these incidents requiring medical attention.

However, dog bite lawsuits are rarely straightforward, as a dog’s owner often presents several defenses to challenge their liability. Understanding these defenses can help victims prepare for counterarguments and strengthen their dog bite cases.

In this comprehensive blog, we will explore the most common defenses used by dog owners in bite lawsuits, how they impact a victim’s ability to recover compensation, and ways to counter these defenses effectively.

Contact us today for a free consultation with our personal injury lawyers. We’ll fight for your rights and help you get the compensation you deserve.

Understanding Dog Bite Laws by State

Dog bite laws generally fall into three categories: strict liability, the one-bite rule, and negligence. Understanding how these legal standards apply in your state is crucial whether you are a dog bite victim or a dog owner defending against a claim.

Strict Liability

In strict liability states, a dog owner is automatically responsible for injuries caused by their dog, regardless of the dog’s history or the owner’s awareness of its aggression. The victim does not need to prove negligence, only that they were lawfully on the property and did not provoke the dog. 

However, defenses such as trespassing or provocation may limit the dog owner’s liability. States like Illinois, New Jersey, and Massachusetts hold owners strictly liable for dog attacks on victims.

One-Bite Rule

The one-bite rule allows dog owners to avoid liability if their dog has never bitten anyone or shown aggression before. Essentially, the owner gets a “free bite” unless the dog has a known history of dangerous behavior. The victim must prove the owner knew the dog was aggressive. Mississippi and Wisconsin are examples of states that follow the one-bite rule.

Negligence

Negligence laws hold a dog owner liable if their failure to exercise reasonable care caused the bite. This could include failing to leash the dog or allowing it to roam freely. Negligence-based claims often require the victim to prove that the owner’s carelessness led to the dog attack.

Filing a dog bite case within the statute of limitations is crucial to preserve your legal right to just compensation. For example, in Illinois, the dog bite statute of limitations is two years, whereas in Wisconsin, victims have three years to file a dog bite case.

The Most Common Defenses Used By Dog Owners 

When facing a dog bite lawsuit, defendants often rely on several common legal defenses to mitigate or dismiss their liability. Understanding these defenses, such as provocation, trespassing, or assumption of risk, is essential for injured victims to present counterarguments in a dog bite lawsuit.

1. The “Provocation” Defense

One of the most frequently invoked defenses in dog bite lawsuits is the argument that the victim provoked the dog. Under this defense, the dog owner claims that the victim’s actions triggered the dog to bite. Provocation can range from intentional acts such as hitting or teasing the dog to unintentional actions like stepping on its tail.

Examples of Provocation:

  • Physical Aggression: The victim kicked, hit, or threw something at the dog.
  • Teasing or Harassment: The victim taunted or harassed the dog, leading to the attack.
  • Unintentional Provocation: Accidentally stepping on the dog’s paw or tail and startling it could be seen as a provocation.

Provocation is a valid defense because it portrays the dog’s actions as a natural response to a perceived threat. If the court finds that the victim provoked the dog, this can significantly reduce or eliminate the owner’s liability, depending on the jurisdiction.

Countering the Provocation Defense:

To counter this defense, the victim must prove that their actions were not threatening or aggressive toward the dog. Witness testimony, video footage, and expert analysis can help demonstrate that the dog attack was unprovoked. In strict liability states, even if provocation is proven, the victim may still recover partial damages.

2. The “Trespassing” Defense

Dog owners may claim that the victim was trespassing on private property at the time of the bite. In many jurisdictions, trespassing can diminish or eliminate the owner’s liability, as they generally do not owe a duty of care to trespassers. Dogs are often seen as protectors of their home, and if the victim was unlawfully on the property, the owner may not be held responsible.

Key Points in the Trespassing Defense:

  • Uninvited Entry: The dog owner argues that the victim entered their property without permission.
  • Criminal Intent: If the victim was committing a crime, such as burglary, at the time of the dog attack, the owner’s liability may be further reduced.

However, this defense does not apply in all cases. For example, mail carriers, delivery drivers, and law enforcement officers are not considered trespassers while performing their official duties, even if the property owner did not explicitly invite them. 

Additionally, in some states, children are given special protection, and a property owner may still be liable if a child was bitten, even if the child wandered onto the property without permission.

Overcoming the Trespassing Defense:

If the dog owner claims trespassing as a defense, the victim must show that they were lawfully on the property or in a public area where the bite occurred. For example, if the victim was near the edge of the property or on a sidewalk, they could argue they were not trespassing.

3. “Assumption of Risk” Defense

The assumption of risk defense is often used when the victim voluntarily exposed themselves to a dangerous situation, knowing the potential risks. This defense is commonly applied in cases involving professionals in the pet industry, such as veterinarians, pet sitters, or dog walkers, who knowingly assume the risk of injury when handling dogs.

How Assumption of Risk Works:

  • Knowledge of Risk: The owner argues that the victim knew or should have known the risks of being around the dog.
  • Voluntary Exposure: Despite knowing the risks, the victim chose to interact with the dog.

For example, if a veterinarian gets bitten while treating a dog, the owner may argue that the vet assumed the risk, and therefore, the owner should not be held liable.

Overcoming the Assumption of Risk Defense:

To overcome this defense, the victim must demonstrate that they were not fully aware of the risks posed by the dog. For example, if the owner did not adequately warn the victim about the dog’s aggressive tendencies, this defense may not hold. In some jurisdictions with strict liability laws, this defense may not apply, as the dog owner is responsible regardless of the victim’s knowledge.

lawyer for dog bite injuries
average dog bite settlement

4. “Comparative Negligence” or “Contributory Negligence”

Dog owners may argue that the victim’s own negligence contributed to the incident. Comparative negligence and contributory negligence defenses assign partial or full blame to the victim, which can reduce or even eliminate the victim’s ability to recover compensation.

Understanding Comparative and Contributory Negligence:

  • Comparative Negligence: In states that follow comparative negligence rules, the court assigns a percentage of fault to both the dog owner and the victim. If the victim is found partially responsible for the incident, their compensation is reduced by that percentage. For example, if the court finds the victim 40% responsible for the attack and the dog owner 60% responsible, the victim would only recover 60% of the total damages.
  • Contributory Negligence: In states that follow contributory negligence laws, the victim may be barred from recovering any compensation if they are found even 1% at fault for the incident.

Examples of Victim Negligence:

  • Ignoring warning signs or instructions from the pet owner.
  • Approaching a dog that is known to be aggressive without caution.
  • Engaging in reckless behavior around the dog, such as startling or cornering it.

Overcoming Comparative or Contributory Negligence Defenses:

To counter these defenses, the victim must show that their actions did not contribute to the bite. This can involve presenting evidence such as witness statements, security footage, or expert testimony that supports the victim’s claim that the dog attacked without provocation.

5. “Lack of Causation” Defense

In some cases, the defense may argue that the dog bite did not cause the victim’s injuries or that the injuries were not as severe as claimed. This is known as the “lack of causation” defense, and it challenges the link between the bite and the damages sought.

Key Points in the Lack of Causation Defense:

  • Preexisting Conditions: The dog’s owner may argue that the victim’s injuries were due to preexisting medical conditions rather than the bite itself.
  • Exaggeration of Injuries: The defense may claim that the victim is exaggerating the extent of their injuries to seek higher compensation.

Overcoming the Lack of Causation Defense:

To overcome this defense, the victim must provide clear evidence linking their injuries directly to the dog bite. Medical records, photographs of the injuries, and expert testimony from healthcare professionals can help prove that the bite caused the injuries. If the defense argues that the victim’s injuries were due to preexisting conditions, a medical expert can clarify how the dog bite exacerbated the victim’s condition.

Compensation Available in Dog Bite Lawsuits

Victims of dog bites may be entitled to several types of compensation, depending on the severity of their injuries and the circumstances of the attack. Compensation for dog attacks can help cover medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and more.

According to the Insurance Information Institute, the average cost of a dog bite insurance claim in 2022 was $64,555. The average dog bite settlement amount was $29,397, with 75% of these personal injury cases not involving serious injuries.

1. Medical Expenses

This includes all medical bills related to the dog bite, such as emergency room visits, surgeries, medication, and follow-up appointments. If the victim requires long-term care or physical therapy, these future medical expenses may also be included.

2. Lost Wages

If the victim is unable to work due to dog bite injuries, they can recover compensation for lost wages. This may also include compensation for future lost earnings if the injuries result in long-term disability or reduced earning capacity.

3. Pain and Suffering

In addition to physical injuries, dog bite victims may experience emotional distress, anxiety, and PTSD after a dog bite. Pain and suffering compensation aims to address the emotional and psychological impact of the attack.

4. Disfigurement and Scarring

If the dog bite leaves permanent scars or disfigurement, especially in visible areas like the face, the victim may be entitled to compensation for the emotional and physical toll of living with disfigurement.

5. Property Damage

In some dog bite cases, the victim’s personal property may be damaged during the attack, such as clothing, eyeglasses, or a phone. Compensation for dog bite claims may be available to cover the cost of repairing or replacing damaged property.

Conclusion

Dog bite lawsuits involve a wide range of legal defenses that can challenge or limit a dog owner’s liability. Defenses like provocation, trespassing, assumption of risk, and comparative negligence are all commonly used by dog owners to reduce their responsibility. Victims of dog bites must understand these defenses to effectively counter them and strengthen their personal injury claims for compensation.

If you have been injured by a dog and are considering legal action, consult an experienced personal injury attorney at the Injury Lawyer Team. We can help you recover maximum compensation for your dog bite injuries using the most effective counterarguments. Call (888) 424-5757 today for a free consultation with our skilled dog bite lawyers.

FAQs

What are the common dog attack injuries sustained by victims?
Common dog attack injuries include puncture wounds, lacerations, infections, nerve damage, scarring, and emotional trauma.

Does homeowner’s insurance cover dog bite injuries?
Yes, many homeowners insurance policies cover dog bite liability, including legal expenses, up to the policy’s liability limits, which are typically between $100,000 and $300,000.

If a dog bites on private property, who will be liable?
The dog’s owner is typically liable for bites that occur on private property, especially if the victim was lawfully present and did not provoke the dog.

No Comments

Leave a Comment